The Influence of Implementing Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Model with Website Assistance to Improve Students' Logical Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v7i1.1804Keywords:
Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL), Website-assisted Learning, Logical Thinking Improvement, Inquiry-based Learning, Educational Technology IntegrationAbstract
This study designed and evaluated the impact of the Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) model, supported by the XPOGIEDU website, on enhancing logical thinking skills in programming (branching, looping) among 37 students of 10th-grade vocational high school. Using the ADDIE framework, the intervention integrated collaborative group work with rotating roles, guided inquiry via worksheets, and iterative problem-solving. Data from pre/post-tests, projects, and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) surveys were analyzed using Excel and SPSS. Results revealed significant improvements in logical thinking, with an overall normalized gain of 0.71, particularly benefiting lower-ability students (e.g., 0.83 gain in logic tests vs. 0.61 for high performers). TAM evaluations reflected strong student acceptance, with perceived usefulness (87.75%), ease of use (85.59%), and positive attitudes (87.57%), validating the platform’s usability. However, limitations such as the short study restricted deeper trend analysis and engagement. Beyond programming, this study underscores POGIL’s potential as a scalable, equity-focused pedagogy for STEM disciplines requiring structured problem-solving (e.g., engineering, data science). The findings advocate for policy reforms prioritizing technology-enhanced inquiry models in vocational and general STEM curricula to bridge skill gaps. Educators should adopt flexible grouping strategies and digital tools to cater to diverse learner needs, while institutions must invest in teacher training for guided inquiry methods. Future research should extend intervention timelines, incorporate adaptive learning technologies, and explore cross-disciplinary applications to optimize long-term outcomes. By aligning pedagogical invention with stoner-centered design, this approach addresses global demands for critical intellects complete at navigating complex STEM challenges.
References
Aiman, U., Hasyda, S., & Uslan, U. (2020). The Influence of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Model Assisted by Realia Media to Improve Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Skill of Primary School Students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1635
Al-khresheh, M. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Promoting Student-Centred Learning Environment: An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ Behaviours in the Saudi EFL Context. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.11917
Andriani, S., Nurlaelah, E., & Yulianti, K. (2019). The effect of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model toward students’ logical thinking ability in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 042108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042108
Asrowi, A., Hadaya, A., & Hanif, M. (2019). The Impact of Using the Interactive E-Book on Students’ Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12245a
Bacci, S., Bertaccini, B., Bruni, R., Crescenzi, F., & Donati, B. (2021). A Structural Equation Model to Measure Logical Competences. In Proceedings e-report 2021 (pp. 37–41). https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8.08
Broy, M., Brucker, A. D., Fantechi, A., Gleirscher, M., Havelund, K., Kuppe, M. A., Mendes, A., Platzer, A., Ringert, J. O., & Sullivan, A. (2025). Does Every Computer Scientist Need to Know Formal Methods? Formal Aspects of Computing, 37(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3670795
Campana, K., & Elizabeth, M. J. (2023). Playing, Tinkering, and Problem Solving: Understanding Early Computational Thinking in Libraries and Museums. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 21(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X231175464
Campana, K., Mills, J. E., Chun, J., & Ickes, J. (2024). Encouraging, Empowering, and Educating: Informal Educators, Caregivers, and Children as Partners in Computational Thinking Activities. Future in Educational Research, 2(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.47
Cresswell, C., & Speelman, C. P. (2020). Does Mathematics Training Lead to Better Logical Thinking and Reasoning? A Cross-sectional Assessment from Students to Professors. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236153
Dornyei, Z., & Muir, C. (2019). Creating a Motivating Classroom Environment. In Springer International Handbooks of Education (pp. 719–736). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_36
Dwijayani, N. M. (2019). Development of Circle Learning Media To Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), 022099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022099
Haryati, S. (2018). The Effectiveness of the Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Model in Educational Psychology Learning. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(2), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i2.24094
Howley, I. (2020). Adapting Guided Inquiry Learning Worksheets for Emergency Remote Learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7/8), 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0086
Kahl, W. (2021). Providing On-Demand Feedback for Improved Learning of Logical Reasoning in Computer Science and Software Engineering. In Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative and Blended Learning (ICBL2020) (pp. 315–326). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_34
Kozedub, A., Dolitskay, I., & Kachan, Y. (2024). The Interconnection Between the Emotional State and the Level of Development of Logical Thinking of Children of Preschool Senior Age. In M.-T. Liong & I. V. Tkacheva (Eds.), BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 84, p. 04011). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248404011
Kussmaul, C. (2022). Adapting Materials for Diverse Contexts to Help Faculty Adopt Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL). In Mobility for Smart Cities and Regional Development - Challenges for Higher Education (pp. 3–12). International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_1
Kusmawan, U. (2024). Beyond Traditional Practicums: Exploring the Potential of Scalable Practicum in Science Courses. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 622-637. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i3.505
Kyshtoobaeva, Ch. A., Stamalieva, K. A., & Seidibakasova, A. Zh. (2024). ). Organization of Different Forms With Logical Tasks. Bulletin of Issyk-Kul University, 51(57), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.69722/1694-8211-2024-57-165-171
Leshchuk, S. O., Ramskyi, Y. S., Kotyk, A. V., & Kutsiy, S. V. (2021). Design A Progressive Web Application To Support Student Learning. CS&SE@SW 2021: 4th Workshop for Young Scientists in Computer Science & Software Engineering, 83–96.
Lin, P.-Y., Chen, P., Liu, Y.-C., & Yang, H.-C. (2024). The Impact of The OK4R Mobile Platform on Vocational Students’ Improvement of Science Reading Comprehension and Logical Thinking. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.90
Lin, X., Yang, W., Wu, L., Zhu, L., Wu, D., & Li, H. (2021). Using an Inquiry-Based Science and Engineering Program to Promote Science Knowledge, Problem-Solving Skills and Approaches to Learning in Preschool Children. Early Education and Development, 32(5), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1795333
Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The Curious Construct of Active Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
Luo, T., Arcaute, K., & Muljana, P. S. (2023). Integrating Inquiry-based Learning into Engineering Education: A Case Study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(6), 836–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2130393
Nasution, M. P., Sormin, D., Lubis, J. N., Wahyuni, S., Siregar, A. K., & Mahir, A. (2024). Harnessing Loose Part Media for Cognitive Development: Evaluating Its Effects on Early Mathematics Play Activities in Early Childhood Education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 6(2), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v6i2.23184
Nicolaou, C., Matsiola, M., & Kalliris, G. (2019). Technology-Enhanced Learning and Teaching Methodologies through Audiovisual Media. Education Sciences, 9(3), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030196
O'ljayevna, O. F., & Shavkatovna, S. R. (2020). The Development of Logical Thinking of Primary School Students in Mathematics. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(2), 235–239.
Öztop, F. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Digital Technology-Assisted STEM Education. Journal of Science Learning, 6(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.52316
Piedade, J., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Matos, J. F. (2020). On Teaching Programming Fundamentals and Computational Thinking with Educational Robotics: A Didactic Experience with Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences, 10(9), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090214
Pressman, A., Ramdass, T., Walls, P., Ford, V., & Turygina, V. (2022). Utilizing virtual reality game design to improve problem solving and logical thinking skills. International Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics (ICNAAM) 2020, 110032. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0081422
Purnama, R. G., & Rahayu, S. (2023). The Role of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) and Its Potential To Improve Students’ Metacognitive Ability: A Systematic Review. THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE EDUCATION (ICoMSE) 2021: Science and Mathematics Education Research: Current Challenges and Opportunities, 030009. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113476
Putri, E. R., Budiyono, B., & Indriati, D. (2020). POGIL Model on Mathematical Connection Ability Viewed from Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(2), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20321
Rodriguez, J.-M. G., Hunter, K. H., Scharlott, L. J., & Becker, N. M. (2020). A Review of Research on Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3506–3520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00355
Shepard, L. A. (2019). Classroom Assessment to Support Teaching and Learning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843818
Simonson, S. R. (2023). POGIL: An Introduction To Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning For Those Who Wish To Empower Learners. Taylor & Francis.
Surpare, K., & Klinieam, K. (2020). Effect of STEM Education Approach on Programming Skills in Basic Microcontroller Learning. The 12th National Conference on Technical Education and The 7th International Conference on Technical Education, 322–325. https://doi.org/10.14416/c.fte.2020.03.049
Taub, M., Sawyer, R., Smith, A., Rowe, J., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2020). The Agency Effect: The Impact of Student Agency on Learning, Emotions, and Problem-Solving Behaviors in a Game-Based Learning Environment. Computers & Education, 147, 103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103781
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alya Arthamevia Solehuddin, Munir, Rasim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education (IJRSE) adopts the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works for non-commercial purposes.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by this license, which allows others to share and adapt the work provided proper attribution is given to the author(s) and the journal.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC 4.0
2. Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright vested exclusively in the author, is free of any third-party rights, and that all necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education aims to disseminate published articles as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, users are permitted to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only, provided that proper attribution is given to the author(s) and this journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright and proprietary rights related to the article, such as patent rights.
- The right to use the substance of the article in future works (e.g., lectures, books).
- The right to reproduce the article for personal purposes.
- The right to self-archive the article.
- The right to enter into separate, additional non-exclusive contractual arrangements for the distribution of the article’s published version (e.g., posting to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in IJRSE.
If the author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with another publisher under a more restrictive license, the author still retains all rights to republish or distribute the work elsewhere, including commercially, as the author is not bound by the license conditions imposed on the journal.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article has multiple authors, the signatory of this agreement warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform all co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement may be terminated by either the author or IJRSE with two months’ notice if the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within one month after receiving written notice.
No breach or violation of this agreement will cause automatic termination or affect the license granted to IJRSE.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To the extent legally permissible, the author waives the right to collect royalties in respect of any use of the article by IJRSE or its sublicensees.
8. Miscellaneous
IJRSE will publish the article (or have it published) once the editorial process has been successfully completed.
The journal reserves the right to edit the article for style, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and consistency as deemed appropriate.
The author acknowledges that the article will be made publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for readers.
