Qualitative indicators to evaluate the relevance and social impact of public university research in northwestern Mexico

Authors

  • Emilia Cristina González-Machado Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
  • Ernesto Israel Santillán-Anguiano Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v7i1.1749

Keywords:

Higher education, Public higher education, Relevance of research, Qualitative Researches, Social impact

Abstract

Research’s relevance and social impact are essential criteria to evaluate if the research produced in universities fits society's wants and needs. There is a growing interest in these two elements that have increased publications that explore the most effective ways to evaluate research projects from this standpoint. There are various papers addressing evaluation from a statistical and bibliometric perspective. This paper delves into the experience of creating an evaluation for social relevance and social impact in research through a series of qualitative indicators brought about by consulting researchers themselves. The procedure was conducting six focus groups with 39 Autonomous University of Baja California researchers, organized by different fields of knowledge. The information submitted for analysis from the participants' discussions delved into their experience in both categories. The results point to 5 indicators linked to the relevance, 8 to the impact, 3 to the research ethics, and eight as proposals for the institution. They pointed out the need for a flexible evaluation to discern the differences between academic disciplines. Likewise, they stress the need to further cooperation between researchers and the social and industry sector to counteract the Mexican government's current scientific investment reduction. Finally, they underline the importance of university spaces for disseminating and divulging research results and products.

References

Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. (2020). Beyond Good Intentions: Designing CSR Initiatives for Greater Social Impact. Journal of Management, 46(6), 937–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319900539

Chen, E., Leos, C., Kowitt, S. D., & Moracco, K. E. (2020). Enhancing community-based participatory research through human-centered design strategies. Health promotion practice, 21(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919850557

Calvard, T., Cherlin, E., Brewster, A., & Curry, L. (2023). Building perspective-taking as an organizational capability: A change intervention in a health care setting. Journal of Management Inquiry, 32(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492621103901

Darwin-Holmes, A. G. (2020). Researcher Positionality – A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research - A New Researcher Guide. Shanlax. International Journal of Education. 8(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232

Estrada-Jaramillo, A., Michael, M., & Farrimond, H. (2022). Absence, multiplicity and the boundaries of research? Reflections on online asynchronous focus groups. Qualitative Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221110169

Farinola, A. (2023). Hermeneutical postphenomenology: Computational tools and the lure of objectivity. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, fqac074, https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac074

Flick, U. (2018). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage.

González, E., Reyes, E., Ramírez, A., Santillán, E. y Herrera, K. (2020). Pertinencia e impacto de la investigación científica. Aportes para orientar la política institucional de la UABC. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.

Gumport, P. (2019). Academic fault Lines. The Rise of Industry Logic in Public Higher Education. Jhon Hopkins University Press.

Halliday, M., Mill, D., Johnson, J., & Lee, K. (2021). Let's talk virtual! Online focus group facilitation for the modern researcher. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 17(12), 2145-2150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.02.003

Hovey, R. B., Vigouroux, M., Noushi, N., Pavate, V., & Amja, K. (2022). Applied Philosophical Hermeneutic Research: the unmethod. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221101237

James, P. (2019). The Social Imaginary in Theory and Practice. In C. Hudson & E. K. Wilson (Eds.) Revisiting the Global Imaginary. Theories, ideologies, Subjetivities: Essays in Honor of Manfred Steger (pp. 33-47). Palgrave Macmillan.

Jung, H. (2019). It does not make sense, but it does: Interactional dynamics in focus group interaction. In K. Roulston. Interactional Studies of Qualitative Research Interviews. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach. In G. Kaiser & N. Presmeg (Eds.). Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education (pp. 181-198). Springer.

Kusmawan, U. (2024). Beyond Traditional Practicums: Exploring the Potential of Scalable Practicum in Science Courses. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 622-637. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i3.505

Kusmawan, U. (2024). Transforming digital learning and assessment strategies in higher education. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(1), 2025016. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025016

Mills, N, Courtney, M, Dede, C, Dressen, A, Gant, R. (2020). Culture and vision in virtual reality narratives. Foreign Language Annals. 53, 733–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12494

Rioufreyt, T. (2019). L’outil et la méthode. Des fonctionnalités techniques des CAQDAS à leurs usages méthodologiques. Introduction. BMS: Bulletin of Sociological Methodology / Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 143, 7–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26747970

Rosenthal, M. (2016). Qualitative research methods: Why, when, and how to conduct interviews and focus groups in pharmacy research. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(4), 509-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.03.021

Stefani, U., Schiavone, F., Laperche, B. & Burger-Helmchen, T. (2020). New tools and practices for financing novelty: a research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(2), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2019-0228

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

González-Machado, E. C., & Santillán-Anguiano, E. I. (2025). Qualitative indicators to evaluate the relevance and social impact of public university research in northwestern Mexico. International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 7(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v7i1.1749

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.