The Pedagogy of Troubleshooting in Electronics Engineering:
Lecturers’ and Laboratory Technicians’ Perceptions at a South African University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v7i1.1720Keywords:
Pedagogy, troubleshooting, engineering education, electronics engineering, perceptionAbstract
Troubleshooting a system or device is a fundamental requirement for an engineering career. Engineering faculty members, including lecturers and laboratory technicians, are responsible for equipping undergraduates with troubleshooting skills. However, faculty members in Science, Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education possess varying competency levels across their disciplines. In engineering education, the focus is particularly on engineering design. This study examined the perceptions of Electronics Engineering faculty members involved in teaching and training undergraduates, particularly regarding troubleshooting, one of the STEM-based core competency skills required in the electronics engineering industry. This research adopted an exploratory qualitative case study design conducted at a South African engineering university. Six faculty members were purposively selected and interviewed, four with previous industry experience and two without. The findings revealed that although faculty members recognized troubleshooting as a crucial STEM-based skill, particularly in engineering, they did not explicitly teach it as they did other competency skills. This study argues that engineering graduates may lack the necessary competencies for industry practice if troubleshooting skills are not integrated through appropriate explicit pedagogical strategies, such as inquiry-based learning, problem-based learning, and hands-on experiential methods supported by technology-enhanced learning tools. Aligning troubleshooting teaching with STEM pedagogies and leveraging educational technology, such as simulation-based learning, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and remote laboratories, and AI-driven simulations, can enhance students’ ability to diagnose and resolve engineering problems effectively.
References
Aebersold, A., Gutierrez, I., & Koenig, J. (2022). "Expanding remote lab access for engineering troubleshooting education." IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(3), 340-355. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3123302
Åkerlind, G. S. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.642845
Attia, J., Hobson, L., & Obiomon, P., (2019). Hands-on learning in multiple courses in electrical and computer engineering, Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Meeting 2018 Papers. American Society for Engineering Education. Texas. http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/6912
Bates, R., Johnson, L., & Miller, T. (2023). AI-driven adaptive learning in engineering education: A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221
Borrego, M. Froyd., E. Henderson, C. S., & Prince, M., (2013). Influence of engineering instructors’ teaching and learning beliefs on pedagogies in engineering science courses, International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 1456-1471. https://pure.psu.edu/en/publications/influence-of-engineering-instructors-teaching-and-learning-belief
Bumbacher, E., Salehi, S., Wieman, C., & Blikstein, P. (2022). The role of intelligent tutoring systems in developing troubleshooting skills in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9719-8
Council on Higher Education (CHE). (2015). Higher Education Qualification Sub-Framework (HEQSF): Alignment of qualifications. Pretoria: CHE. https://bit.ly/framework-qualification-standards-higher-education
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K., (2011). Research methods in education, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Colbeck, C. L., Cabrera, A.F., & Marine, R. J., (2002). Faculty motivation to use alternative teaching methods, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA,. 36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234747854_Faculty_Motivation_To_Use_Alternative_Teaching_Methods
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D., (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. https://bit.ly/3W3Aw7r
Diong, B., Yusof, K. M., & Natarajan, R. (2021). Addressing undergraduate engineering students' troubleshooting deficiencies in design projects: A pedagogical approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(2), 205-214. https://sl.ut.ac.id/IEEE-Transactions-on-Education-Addressing-Undergraduate
Dounas-Frazer, D. R., & Lewandowski, H., (2017). Electronics lab instructors’ approaches to troubleshooting instruction, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010102. ERIC - EJ1129991
Dounas-Frazer, D. R., Van De Bogart, K. L., Stetzer, M. R., & Lewandowski, H., (2015). The role of modeling in troubleshooting: An example from electronics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.03939. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1507.03939
ECSA., (2017). Qualification standard for Bachelor of Science in Engineering, Pretoria, South Africa: ECSA. https://sl.ut.ac.id/NQF_Number-8
Fatokun, J. O., (2018). Exploring the place of troubleshooting in an undergraduate electronics engineering education programme at a university in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation). Exploring the place of troubleshooting in an undergraduate electronics engineering education programme at a university in South Africa.
Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., and Rugarcia, A., (2000). The future of engineering education: Part 2. Teaching methods that work, Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26-39. https://sl.ut.ac.id/The-future-of-enggeering
Finkelstein, N. D., Jona, K., Adams, W. K., & LeMaster, R. (2020). The impact of remote and virtual laboratories on troubleshooting skills in engineering education. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(3), 23-38. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol2no3/finkelstein.htm
Freeman, S., Haak, D. C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2021). "Increased course structure improves performance in STEM education." Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-08-0105
Fuhrmann, T., Levy, S. T., Wilensky, U., Bumbacher, E., Blikstein, P., Saba, J., ... & Wilkerson, M. (2022). Developing Accessible and Sustainable Computational Modeling Tools in Learning Science: What Is Next? In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2022, pp. 1715-1722. International Society of the Learning Sciences. Fuhrmann Developing.pdf
Gow, L., & Kember, D., (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 20-23. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x
Gregar, J. (2023). Research design (qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches). Research Design, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2
Hadgraft, R. G., & Kolmos, A., (2020). Emerging learning environments in engineering education, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1713522
Hanauer, D., Alvey, R., An, P., Bancroft, C., Butela, K., Coleman, S., ... & Sivanathan, V. (2024, October). The professional identity of STEM faculty as instructors of course-based research experiences. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 9, p. 1442306). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1442306
Hochholdinger, S., & Schaper, N., (2013). Training troubleshooting skills with an anchored instruction module in an authentic computer-based simulation environment, Journal of Technical Education (JOTED), 1(1). scholar.archive.org/work/ehofsgt2frfyhmx27e4iyd3kk4
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B., (2006). Everyday problem-solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators, Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x
Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W., (2006). Learning to troubleshoot: A new theory-based design architecture, Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 77-114. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10648-006-9001-8
Kolodner, M., Ju, M., Fan, Z., Zhao, T., Ghazizadeh, E., Wu, Y., ... & Liu, Y. (2024). Robust training objectives improve embedding-based retrieval in industrial recommendation systems. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.14682
Kusmawan, U. (2024). Beyond Traditional Practicums: Exploring the Potential of Scalable Practicum in Science Courses. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 622-637. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i3.505
Larsson, J., & Holmström, I., (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620601068105
Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (2012). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. https://philpapers.org/archive/LEFTPO-4.pdf
Lui, D., Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2024). Collaborative troubleshooting in STEM: a case study of high school students finding and fixing code, circuit and craft challenges in electronic textiles. Cognition and Instruction, 42(3), 359-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2024.2334697
Male, S., Bush, M., & Chapman, E., (2010). Perceptions of competency Deficiency in engineering graduates, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2010.11464039
Marton, F., (1988). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. In R. R. Sherman and R. B. Webb (Eds.), Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods (pp. 143-161), London: Routledge Falmer. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42589189
Marton, F., & Booth, S., (2013). Learning and awareness, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203053690
Mason, G., & Shah, A. (2021). Bridging the skills gap: Integrating AI and virtual reality in engineering troubleshooting education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(4), 331- 345. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmj.12094
Mickelson, S., Hanneman, L., Guardiola, R., & Brumm, T., (2001). June, Development of workplace competencies sufficient to measure ABET outcomes, In Proceedings of 2001 Annual Conference (pp. 6-383). https://10.18260/1-2—9136
Middleton, A. (2017). Active learning and educational change in engineering curricula: A pedagogical perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 789-804. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/03043797.2016.1254161
Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., & Milas, N. (2022). The role of digital twins in engineering education: Enhancing troubleshooting skills in virtual environments. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 102-119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-manufacturing-systems/vol/64/suppl/C
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jonathan Olanrewaju Fatokun, Mishack Thiza Gumbo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education (IJRSE) adopts the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works for non-commercial purposes.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by this license, which allows others to share and adapt the work provided proper attribution is given to the author(s) and the journal.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC 4.0
2. Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright vested exclusively in the author, is free of any third-party rights, and that all necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education aims to disseminate published articles as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, users are permitted to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only, provided that proper attribution is given to the author(s) and this journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright and proprietary rights related to the article, such as patent rights.
- The right to use the substance of the article in future works (e.g., lectures, books).
- The right to reproduce the article for personal purposes.
- The right to self-archive the article.
- The right to enter into separate, additional non-exclusive contractual arrangements for the distribution of the article’s published version (e.g., posting to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in IJRSE.
If the author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with another publisher under a more restrictive license, the author still retains all rights to republish or distribute the work elsewhere, including commercially, as the author is not bound by the license conditions imposed on the journal.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article has multiple authors, the signatory of this agreement warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform all co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement may be terminated by either the author or IJRSE with two months’ notice if the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within one month after receiving written notice.
No breach or violation of this agreement will cause automatic termination or affect the license granted to IJRSE.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To the extent legally permissible, the author waives the right to collect royalties in respect of any use of the article by IJRSE or its sublicensees.
8. Miscellaneous
IJRSE will publish the article (or have it published) once the editorial process has been successfully completed.
The journal reserves the right to edit the article for style, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and consistency as deemed appropriate.
The author acknowledges that the article will be made publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for readers.
