The pedagogy of troubleshooting in Electronics Engineering:
Lecturers’ and laboratory technicians’ perceptions at a South African university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v7i1.1720Keywords:
Pedagogy, troubleshooting, engineering education, electronics engineering, perceptionAbstract
Troubleshooting a system or device is a fundamental requirement for an engineering career. Engineering faculty members, including lecturers and laboratory technicians, are responsible for equipping undergraduates with troubleshooting skills. However, faculty members in Science, Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education possess varying competency levels across their disciplines. In engineering education, the focus is particularly on engineering design. This study examined the perceptions of Electronics Engineering faculty members involved in teaching and training undergraduates, particularly regarding troubleshooting, one of the STEM-based core competency skills required in the electronics engineering industry. This research adopted an exploratory qualitative case study design conducted at a South African engineering university. Six faculty members were purposively selected and interviewed, four with previous industry experience and two without. The findings revealed that although faculty members recognized troubleshooting as a crucial STEM-based skill, particularly in engineering, they did not explicitly teach it as they did other competency skills. This study argues that engineering graduates may lack the necessary competencies for industry practice if troubleshooting skills are not integrated through appropriate explicit pedagogical strategies, such as inquiry-based learning, problem-based learning, and hands-on experiential methods supported by technology-enhanced learning tools. Aligning troubleshooting teaching with STEM pedagogies and leveraging educational technology, such as simulation-based learning, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and remote laboratories, and AI-driven simulations, can enhance students’ ability to diagnose and resolve engineering problems effectively.
References
Aebersold, A., Gutierrez, I., & Koenig, J. (2022). "Expanding remote lab access for engineering troubleshooting education." IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(3), 340-355
Åkerlind, G. S. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 115-127.
Attia, J., Hobson, L., & Obiomon, P., (2019). Hands-on learning in multiple courses in electrical and computer engineering, Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Meeting 2018 Papers. American Society for Engineering Education. Texas.
Bates, R., Johnson, L., & Miller, T. (2023). AI-driven adaptive learning in engineering education: A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 45-63.
Borrego, M. Froyd., E. Henderson, C. S., & Prince, M., (2013). Influence of engineering instructors’ teaching and learning beliefs on pedagogies in engineering science courses, International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(6), 1456-1471.
Bumbacher, E., Salehi, S., Wieman, C., & Blikstein, P. (2022). The role of intelligent tutoring systems in developing troubleshooting skills in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-18.
Council on Higher Education (CHE). (2015). Higher Education Qualification Sub-Framework (HEQSF): Alignment of qualifications. Pretoria: CHE.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K., (2011). Research methods in education, New York: Routledge.
Colbeck, C. L., Cabrera, A.F., & Marine, R. J., (2002). Faculty motivation to use alternative teaching methods, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA,. 36.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D., (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Diong, B., Yusof, K. M., & Natarajan, R. (2021). Addressing undergraduate engineering students' troubleshooting deficiencies in design projects: A pedagogical approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(2), 205-214.
Dounas-Frazer, D. R., & Lewandowski, H., (2017). Electronics lab instructors’ approaches to troubleshooting instruction, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010102.
Dounas-Frazer, D. R., Van De Bogart, K. L., Stetzer, M. R., & Lewandowski, H., (2015). The role of modeling in troubleshooting: An example from electronics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.03939.
Dounas-Frazer, D. R., Van De Bogart, K. L., Stetzer, M. R., & Lewandowski, H., (2016). Investigating the role of model-based reasoning while troubleshooting an electric circuit, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010137.
ECSA., (2017). Qualification standard for Bachelor of Science in Engineering, Pretoria, South Africa: ECSA.
Fatokun, J. O., (2018). Exploring the place of troubleshooting in an undergraduate electronics engineering education programme at a university in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation).
Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., and Rugarcia, A., (2000). The future of engineering education: Part 2. Teaching methods that work, Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26-39.
Finkelstein, N. D., Jona, K., Adams, W. K., & LeMaster, R. (2020). The impact of remote and virtual laboratories on troubleshooting skills in engineering education. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(3), 23-38.
Freeman, S., Haak, D. C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2021). "Increased course structure improves performance in STEM education." Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216.
Fuhrmann, T., Levy, S. T., Wilensky, U., Bumbacher, E., Blikstein, P., Saba, J., ... & Wilkerson, M. (2022). Developing Accessible and Sustainable Computational Modeling Tools in Learning Science: What Is Next? In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2022, pp. 1715-1722. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Gow, L., & Kember, D., (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 20-23.
Gregar, J. (2023). Research design (qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches). Research Design, 8.
Hadgraft, R. G., & Kolmos, A., (2020). Emerging learning environments in engineering education, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 3-16.
Hanauer, D., Alvey, R., An, P., Bancroft, C., Butela, K., Coleman, S., ... & Sivanathan, V. (2024, October). The professional identity of STEM faculty as instructors of course-based research experiences. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 9, p. 1442306). Frontiers Media SA.
Hochholdinger, S., & Schaper, N., (2013). Training troubleshooting skills with an anchored instruction module in an authentic computer-based simulation environment, Journal of Technical Education (JOTED), 1(1).
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B., (2006). Everyday problem-solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators, Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.
Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W., (2006). Learning to troubleshoot: A new theory-based design architecture, Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 77-114.
Kolodner, M., Ju, M., Fan, Z., Zhao, T., Ghazizadeh, E., Wu, Y., ... & Liu, Y. (2024). Robust training objectives improve embedding-based retrieval in industrial recommendation systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14682.
Kusmawan, U. (2024). Beyond Traditional Practicums: Exploring the Potential of Scalable Practicum in Science Courses. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 622-637. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i3.505
Larsson, J., & Holmström, I., (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2(1), 55-64.
Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (2012). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lui, D., Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2024). Collaborative troubleshooting in STEM: a case study of high school students finding and fixing code, circuit and craft challenges in electronic textiles. Cognition and Instruction, 42(3), 359-398.
Male, S., Bush, M., & Chapman, E., (2010). Perceptions of competency Deficiency in engineering graduates, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1), 55-68.
Marton, F., (1988). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. In R. R. Sherman and R. B. Webb (Eds.), Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods (pp. 143-161), London: Routledge Falmer.
Marton, F., & Booth, S., (2013). Learning and awareness, New York: Routledge.
Mason, G., & Shah, A. (2021). Bridging the skills gap: Integrating AI and virtual reality in engineering troubleshooting education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(4), 331- 345.
Mickelson, S., Hanneman, L., Guardiola, R., & Brumm, T., (2001). June, Development of workplace competencies sufficient to measure ABET outcomes, In Proceedings of 2001 Annual Conference (pp. 6-383).
Middleton, A. (2017). Active learning and educational change in engineering curricula: A pedagogical perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 789-804.
Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., & Milas, N. (2022). "The role of digital twins in engineering education: Enhancing troubleshooting skills in virtual environments." Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 102-119.
National Academy of Engineering (2021). The Future of Undergraduate STEM Education: A Framework for Integration and Innovation. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Nguyen, P., Kim, D., & Lin, W. (2023). "Augmented reality-based troubleshooting pedagogy in engineering laboratories." Advances in Engineering Education, 11(2), 102-118
Passow, H. J., (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95-118.
Pease, A. (2013). The limits of AI in engineering troubleshooting: A case for human cognition. Engineering Technology Review, 25(2), 67-80.
Rivera-Reyes, P., & Boyles, R. E., (2013). June, Training in troubleshooting problem-solving: Preparing undergraduate engineering students for industry, In Proceedings of 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1261).
Ross, C., & Orr, R. R., (2009). Teaching structured troubleshooting: Integrating a standard methodology into an information technology program, Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(2), 251-265.
Tafur, M., Evangelou, D., & Strobel, J., (2012). Troubleshooting skills for non-engineers in technological jobs, Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education. San Antonio, Texas.
Tan, A. L., Teo, T. W., Choy, B. H., & Ong, Y. S. (2019). The STEM quartet. Innovation and Education, 1(1), 1-14.
Trevelyan, J., (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice, Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 191-204.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M., (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275-284.
Tufur, M., Rahman, M., & Ismail, S. (2012). Developing troubleshooting skills in engineering students through structured learning strategies. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 7(3), 67-76
Van De Bogart, K. L., Dounas-Frazer, D. R., Lewandowski, H. J., & Stetzer, M. R., (2017). Investigating the role of socially mediated metacognition during collaborative troubleshooting of electric circuits, Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020116.
Wang, Y., Li, R., & Xu, Z. (2022). "Artificial intelligence-driven tutoring systems for troubleshooting education in engineering." Computers & Education, 180, 104-132.
Zhang, Y., Xu, L., & Li, R. (2023). "AI-assisted adaptive learning in engineering troubleshooting education: A systematic review." Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 45-67.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jonathan Olanrewaju Fatokun, Mishack Thiza Gumbo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education's objective is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Research in STEM Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher, and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education at two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Research in STEM Education will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Research in STEM Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
