Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge into Chemistry Lessons on Acids and Bases:
Exploring Potential and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v6i2.1714Keywords:
Indigenous Knowledge, Science Education, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Curriculum Integration, Educational PolicyAbstract
This study delved into the potential and hurdles involved in integrating indigenous knowledge (IK) into Physical Science lessons among Namibian teachers. Rooted in an interpretive paradigm, it adopted a qualitative case study approach, gathering data through observations and stimulated recall interviews. Socio-cultural theory served as the overarching framework, with Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) used as a lens for data analysis. Specifically, the study employed five knowledge components within the realm of topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge (TSPCK) to scrutinize the data. Two Grade 9 Physical Science teachers were observed teaching concepts on Acids and Bases, with each teacher's two lessons providing qualitative data. Teachers were purposively sampled for inclusion in the study. The findings indicated that teachers possessed local knowledge that could be effectively integrated into Physical Science topics. For example, the topic of acids and bases was identified as conducive to incorporating IK. Both observed teachers utilized local substances to enable learners to practically test them using litmus paper (blue or red). Substances such as Omutoko (wood ash), Oshikundu (a traditional drink made from Mahangu flour and sorghum), Oshimhumu (a shrub used for dental hygiene), and Onghalanyenye (subterranean soil) were tested for their acidic or alkaline properties during Physical Science lessons. Stimulated recall interviews further revealed teachers' awareness of homegrown substances suitable for teaching acids and bases in science lessons.
References
Abah, J., Mashebe, P., &Denuga, D. D. (2015). Prospect of integrating African indigenous knowledge systems into the teaching of sciences in Africa. American Journal of Educational Research, 3, 668-673. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-6-1
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural Science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3%3C269::AID-TEA3%3E3.0.CO;2-T
Akbar, R. A. (2012). Mind the fact: Teaching science without practical as body without soul. Journal of Elementary Education, 22(1), 1-08. https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/JEE/PDF-Files/1_Rafaqat-1_2012JEE_Vol_22_no_1.pdf
Allahyar, N., & Nazari, A. (2012). Potentiality of Vygotsky’s socio-cultural theory in exploring the role of teacher perceptions, expectations and interaction strategies. Working Paper in Language Pedagogy, 6, 79-92. https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ZJ2045294297.pdf
Bertram, C., & Christiansen, I. (2015). Understanding research: An introduction to reading research. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 336879036_Understanding_Research_2_FULL_COVER
Blake, B., & Pope, T. (2008). Developmental Psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s Theories in Classrooms: Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1, 59-67. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Developmental-Psychology%3A-Incorporating-Piaget%27s-in-Blake-Pope/36534322b7c9e3a0432e1c84531aa8f288e79642
Cobern, W. W., Loving C. C. (1999). Defining “Science” in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. John Wiley & Sons, incl. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED418852.pdf
Cooks, M. L., Alexander, J., & Dold, T. (2012). InkcubekoNendalo: A Bio-cultural Diversity Schools Education Project in South Africa and its implication for inclusive indigenous knowledge systems (IKS) sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475232
Drechsler, M., & Schmidt, H-J. (2005). Textbooks and teachers’ understanding of acid-base models used in Chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education research and Practices, (6), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90002B
Henning, E., Van Rensburg, W., &Smit, B. (2007). Finding your way in qualitative research. South Africa, Pretoria: Van Schaik. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/5590483
Kibirige, I., & Van Rooyen, H. (2006). Enriching science teaching through the inclusion of indigenous knowledge. In J. de Beers & H. Van Rooyen (Eds.), Teaching science in the OBE classroom. Bloemfontein: Macmillan. https://www.coursehero.com/file/229451414/IKS-Van-Rooyen-H-De-Beer-J-2006-Teaching-Science-in-the-OBE-classroom-Macmillan-7p-of-248p/
Kota, L. S. (2006). Local Food Choices and Nutrition: A Case Study of Amarewuin the FET Consumer Studies Curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis. Education Department, Rhodes University. Grahamstown. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/145045937.pdf
Mhakure, D & Otulaja, F. S. (2017). Culturally responsive pedagogy in science education. In F. S. Otulaja & M. B. Ogunniyi (Eds.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Science Education in Sub-Sahara Africa (pp81-100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-6351-089-9_6
Mukwambo, M., Ngcoza, K., & Chikunda, C. (2014). Africanisation, Ubuntu and IKS: A learner-centered approach. In C.I.O. Okeke, M.M. van Wyk, & N.T. Phasha (Eds.), Schooling, society and inclusive education: An African perspective (pp 1-16). Cape Town: Oxford University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269098812_Schooling_society_ and_Inclusive_education
Ogunniyi M. B. (2007). Teachers’ Stances and Practical Arguments Regarding a Science Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum: Part 1, International Journal of Science Education, 29, 963-986. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600931038
Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2014). PCK of teaching electrochemistry in chemistry teachers: A case in Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. EducaciónQuímica, 25(3), 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(14)70551-8
Ryan, J & Gass, S (2015). Situmated Recall. Upload on 15 October 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267573796
Shizha, E. (2007). Critical analysis of problems encountered in incorporating indigenous knowledge in science teaching by primary school teachers in Zimbabwe. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53, 302-319. https://sl.ut.ac.id/Critical-analysis-of-problems
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Education Researcher, 15, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Teemant, A. (2005). Evaluating Socio Cultural Pedagogy in a Distance Teacher Education Program: Teacher Education Quarterly, Assessing Innovation in Teacher Education, 32, 49-62. https://sl.ut.ac.id/Evaluating-Socio-Cultural-Pedagogy
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Ground theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972
Woodley, E. (2009). Practical work in school Science-why is it important? School Science Review, 91(335), 49-51. http://www.gettingpractical.org.uk/documents/EmmaWoodleyarticle.pdf
Ogunniyi, M. B., & Ogawa, M. (2008). The prospects and challenges of training South African and Japanese educator to enact an indigenized science curriculum. South Africa Journal of Higher Education, 22, 175-190. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC37424
Otulaja, F. S., Cameron, A., & Msimanga, A. (2011). Rethinking argumentation teaching strategies and indigenous knowledge in South African science classrooms: Culture Studies of Science Education, 6, 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9351-5
Mavhunga, E., Ibrahim, B., Qhobela, M., & Rollnick, M. (2016). Student teachers’ competence to transfer strategies for developing PCK for Electric Circuits to another Physical Science topic. African Journal of research of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20, 299-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2016.1237000
Pitjeng-Mosabala, P., & Rollnick, M. (2018). Exploring the Development of Novice Unqualified Graduate Teachers’ Topic Specific PCK in Teaching the Particulate Nature of Matter in South African’s Classrooms. In Press International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1446569
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fredrick Simataa Simasiku, Kenneth M. Ngcoza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education (IJRSE) adopts the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly works for non-commercial purposes.
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by this license, which allows others to share and adapt the work provided proper attribution is given to the author(s) and the journal.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC 4.0
2. Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright vested exclusively in the author, is free of any third-party rights, and that all necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education aims to disseminate published articles as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, users are permitted to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only, provided that proper attribution is given to the author(s) and this journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright and proprietary rights related to the article, such as patent rights.
- The right to use the substance of the article in future works (e.g., lectures, books).
- The right to reproduce the article for personal purposes.
- The right to self-archive the article.
- The right to enter into separate, additional non-exclusive contractual arrangements for the distribution of the article’s published version (e.g., posting to an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in IJRSE.
If the author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with another publisher under a more restrictive license, the author still retains all rights to republish or distribute the work elsewhere, including commercially, as the author is not bound by the license conditions imposed on the journal.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article has multiple authors, the signatory of this agreement warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform all co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement may be terminated by either the author or IJRSE with two months’ notice if the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within one month after receiving written notice.
No breach or violation of this agreement will cause automatic termination or affect the license granted to IJRSE.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To the extent legally permissible, the author waives the right to collect royalties in respect of any use of the article by IJRSE or its sublicensees.
8. Miscellaneous
IJRSE will publish the article (or have it published) once the editorial process has been successfully completed.
The journal reserves the right to edit the article for style, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and consistency as deemed appropriate.
The author acknowledges that the article will be made publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for readers.
