Responding to the literacy load of science in monocultural contexts:
Preparation programs can change teacher classroom behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v6i2.1704Keywords:
disciplinary literacy, standards, science, language, policy, changeAbstract
Existing research about literacy within different subjects suggests that specialist language styles add an extra load to student learning. This has resulted in changes to centralized policy mandates in various jurisdictions, eliciting a variety of responses, including enthusiasm, agreement, compliance, neglect, subversion, and/or resistance. This mixed method study investigated whether 55 secondary school teachers from a culturally homogenous coastal region of Eastern Australia recognized literacy issues within science and their responses to such issues. There were three main findings. Firstly, only one third of participating mainstream science teachers accepted direct responsibility for helping their students deal with the literacy load of science, but most participating teachers recognized the literacy nature of more than half of the activities suggested to them. Secondly, participants teaching classes at several grade levels, and female participants, reported using a greater range of literacy activities in their science classes, and more clearly content-related activities were mentioned more frequently. Thirdly, participants who had completed a postgraduate teacher preparation program were more likely to express confidence in dealing with the literacy load of science and acceptance of responsibility for doing so. Time spent on literacy in teacher preparation programs appears to influence positive mainstream science teacher attitudes and practices in response to the literacy load of science. Study findings challenge conventional views of teacher recalcitrance, and they support the maintenance of policy and teacher preparation practices that encourage science teachers to respond productively to student literacy needs that have been identified by on-going research.
References
ACARA. (2012). National Curriculum: Science - Foundation to Year 10 Curriculum (Version 1.1). Retrieved 20 November 2012 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Science/Curriculum/F-10
ACARA. (2023). Literacy (Version 8.4). https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/literacy/
AITSL. (2017). Teacher Standards. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/standards
Barry, D., Pendergast, D., & Main, K. (2020). Teacher perspectives on the use of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers as part of their evaluation process. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 45(8), 1-22.
Bovey, W.H. & Hede, A. (2001). Resistance to organisational change: The role of cognitive and affective processes. Leadership & Organisation Development Journal, 22(8), 372-382.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic Analysis. American Psychological Association.
Comber, B. (2012). Mandated literacy assessment and the reorganisation of teachers’ work: Federal policy, local effects. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 119-136. DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2012.672331
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3 ed.). Sage Publications.
Davison, C., & Ollerhead, S. (2018). But I’m not an English teacher!: Disciplinary literacy in Australian science classrooms. In K. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 29-43). Springer.
Derewianka, B. (2012). Knowledge about language in the Australian curriculum: English. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 127-146.
Dilkes, J., Cunningham, C., & Gray, J. (2014). The new Australian curriculum, teachers and change fatigue. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(11), 45-64.
Edge, K., Reynolds, R., & O’Toole, J. M. (2014). Quality Teaching; ‘Classroom Pedagogical Alignment’; and why teachers teach as they do. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 9(3), 211-227.
Evans, J. D. (1974). Vocabulary problems in teaching science. School Science Review, 55(192), 585-590.
Fang, Z. (2024). Demystifying academic reading: A disciplinary approach to reading across content areas, Routledge.
Foss, D. H., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' views of pedagogical and mathematical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 429-442.
Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform (Vol. 204, Seminar Series). Centre for Strategic Education.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (1992). Teacher development and educational change. Routledge.
Glaeser, B., Leuer, M., & Grant, M. (2012). Changing teacher beliefs about promoting literacy in content area classes. Research in Higher Education Journal, 16(1), 1-8.
HMSO. (1975). A language for life: Report of the committee of inquiry appointed by the Secretary of State for Education and Science under the chairmanship of Sir Alan Bullock. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/bullock/
Khoboli, B., Kibirige, I., & O’Toole, J. M. (2013). Teacher responses to policy implementation seen through a creative lens: Student-centred teaching in Lesotho science classes. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1-2), 152-161.
Laufer, M. (2023). Fear, loathing and ideology: Why academics resist edtech. University World News, April 1, https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230328141715682
Ledger, S., Ure, C., Burgess, M., & Morrison, C. (2020). Professional experience in Australian initial teacher education: An appraisal of policy and practice. Higher Education Studies, 10(4), 116-130.
Levinson, R. (2001). Should controversial issues in science be taught through the humanities? School Science Review, 82(300), 97-101.
Lewis, S., Savage, G. C., & Holloway, J. (2020). Standards without standardisation? Assembling standards-based reforms in Australian and US schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 35(6), 737-764.
Lively, B. A., & Pressey, S. L. (1923). A method for measuring the ‘vocabulary burden’ of textbooks. Educational Administration and Supervision, 9(9), 389-398.
Martin, J. R. (2000/2012). Grammar meets Genre: Reflections on the ‘Sydney School’. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229425914.pdf
O’Toole, J. M., Burke, R., & Absalom, D. (2012). Language, literacies and learning. Boraga Academic.
O’Toole, J. M., & Laugesen, R. (2011). Developing specialist language styles: Research and application. Boraga Academic.
Philipp-Muller, A., Lee, S.W.S. & Petty, R.E. (2022). Why are people anti-science, and what can we do about it? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2120755119
Píšová, M. (2013). Teacher professional socialisation: Objective determinants Orbis scholae, 7(2), 67-80.
Poole, M. (1995). Beliefs and values in science education. Open University Press.
Reid, A. (2005). Rethinking national curriculum collaboration: Towards an Australian curriculum. Department of Education, Science and Training.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2017). Disciplinary literacy: Just the FAQs. Educational Leadership, 74(5), 18-22.
Sprat, T. (1667/1958). History of the Royal Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge (facsimile ed.). Washington University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1985). Episodes in ESP: A source and reference book on the development of English for Science and Technology. Pergamon Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Webster, R. S., & Whelen, J. D. (2019). Understanding and interrogating professional standards. In R. Webster & J. Whelen (Eds.), Rethinking reflection and ethics for teachers (pp. 15-32). Springer.
Xiao, X., & Wong, R. M. (2020). Vaccine hesitancy and perceived behavioural control: A meta-analysis. Vaccine, 5131-5138. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.076
Zangmo, D., O’Toole, J. M., & Burke, R. (2013). Alignment and implementation: Process Writing in Bhutan. The Journal for ESL Teachers and Students, II, 75-81.
Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what Principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238-249. DOI: 10.1177/0192636506291521

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr Brian Duckworth, Dr Suzanne MacQueen , Dr Mitch O'Toole

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education's objective is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Research in STEM Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher, and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education at two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Research in STEM Education will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Research in STEM Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.