Unlocking The Potential of Artificial Intellignce:
A New Paradigm for Assessment in 21st Century Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v6i2.1698Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Educational Assessment, Systematic Review, Ethical Considerations, Adaptive Learning SystemsAbstract
This systematic review explores the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping assessment practices within 21st-century education. It critically examines the integration of AI technologies such as Automated Essay Scoring (AES), adaptive learning systems, and learning analytics, emphasizing their contributions to personalized learning experiences and real-time feedback mechanisms. The review identifies key opportunities for AI to enhance educational assessment, including the automation of scoring and the provision of adaptive feedback. However, it also addresses significant ethical challenges such as algorithmic bias, data privacy, and the need for transparency. We urge policymakers and educators to establish robust ethical guidelines and invest in comprehensive educator training to ensure the responsible use of AI in educational settings. The future directions suggest an increase in the integration of AI technologies, emphasizing the need for ongoing research to enhance validity, reliability, and address ethical considerations in AI-driven assessment practices.
References
Almond, R. G., Steinberg, L. S., & Mislevy, R. J. (2002). Enhancing the design and delivery of assessment systems: A four-process architecture. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(1), 3-48.
Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® v.2. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(3), 1-30.
Baker, R., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 551-560). Springer.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Chen, B., et al. (2019). AI-supported formative assessment: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2812.
Churi, B., et al. (2022). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: State-of-the-Art Research and Future Directions. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(1), 1-13.
Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 5(1), 1-36.
Jones, E. F., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational assessment: Opportunities and challenges for equitable assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(4), 47-55.
Kaipa, S. C. (2021). Traditional assessment practices in education. Journal of Educational Assessment, 2(1), 45-58.
Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us. Harvard University Press.
Li, L., & Garcia, J. F. (2023). Ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence for educational assessment. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(1), 23-42.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 1(1), 3-62.
Park, S. W., & Lee, J. H. (2022). The effects of adaptive feedback on students' performance and motivation in online learning environments: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 176, 104385.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. National Academies Press.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
Shermis, M. D., & Hamner, B. (2012). Contrasting state-of-the-art automated scoring of essays: Analysis. In G. Attali & D. Powers (Eds.), Automated Scoring of Writing Quality (pp. 21-44). Routledge.
Shute, V. J. (2017). Evolution of assessment in education. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. 1-23). Springer.
Shute, V. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2014). Formative and stealth assessment. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 311-321). Springer.
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. d. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication
Smith, A. B., & Johnson, C. D. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in educational assessment: Current perspectives and future potential. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 875-892.
van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students' learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475-511.
vanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Isaac Ogunsakin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education's objective is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Research in STEM Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher, and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education at two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Research in STEM Education will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Research in STEM Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.