Enhancing Students' Scientific Argumentation Skills through STEM-Based Problem Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v6i1.1691Keywords:
Problem Based Learning , STEM , Scientific Argumentation AbilityAbstract
This study examines the efficacy of STEM-based Problem Based Learning (PBL) in enhancing scientific argumentation skills among students, focusing on respiratory system material. Employing a Quasi-Experimental Design, this research involved tests, observations, and questionnaires to assess the changes in students' scientific argumentation abilities. The study enrolled students from two classes, utilizing a purposive sampling technique to ensure comparability. Results indicated a significant improvement in students' scientific argumentation skills, with average scores increasing from 81.57% in the first meeting to 86.14% in the second meeting, categorized as very good. Additionally, statistical analysis revealed a notable difference between the experimental and control groups, with a p-value less than 0.05, confirming the effectiveness of the STEM-based PBL approach. The study suggests that integrating STEM into PBL can significantly enhance students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills, recommending wider application in educational settings to better prepare students for complex scientific challenges.
Downloads
References
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan Project Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 202-212.
Anita, A., Afandi, A., & Tenriawaru, A. B. (2019). Pentingnya Keterampilan Argumentasi di Era Ledakan Informasi Digital. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKIP 2019. In Optimalisasi Kualitas Pembelajaran Abad 21 di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 dalam Menghasilkan Pendidikan yang Profesional, pp. 1740-1746.
Arends, I. R. (2007). Learning to Teach (Belajar untuk Mengajar). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Djaali. (2013). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: CV Pedoman Ilmu Jaya.
Erduran, S & Orborne. (2005). The Role of Argument in Developing ScienceLiteracy. Research and Quality of Science Education. Nederlands: Spinger.
Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2005). The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy. Research and the Quality of Science Education, 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_30/COVER
Farwati, R., Permanasari, A., Firman, H., dan Suhery, T. (2017). Integrasi Problem Based Learning dalam STEM Education Berorientasi pada Aktualisasi Literasi Lingkungan dan Kreativitas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya.
Fisher, Alec. (2009). Berpikir Kritis Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Forawi, S. (2018). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education: Meaningful learning contexts and frameworks. International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE), 1–4. DOI:10.1109/ICCCEEE.2018.8515885
Hmelo-Silver CE. (2004) Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educ Psychol Rev 2004,16(3),235–266.
Hoti, I., & Muka, R. (2017). The importance of knowing and applying the standards in a scientific research. International Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.11.1.5
Huang, C. & Archer, A., (2017). Academic literacies as moving beyond writing: Investigating multimodal approaches to academic argument. London Review of Education, 15(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.1.06
Husamah, Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE Learning Model: Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills Of Biology Teacher Candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249–264.
Imaniar, B. O., & Astutik, S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika, 4(1), 92–96.
Keraf. (2007). Argumentasi dan Narasi Komposisi Lanjut III. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Khadri, H.O. (2022). Becoming future-proof STEM teachers for enhancing sustainable development: A proposed general framework for capacity-building programs in future studies. Prospects, 52, 421–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09588-0
Khun, D. 2010. Teaching And Learning Science As Argument. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed. 94: 810-824
Narendranath, A.D., & Allen, J. (2023). Automatic Text Analysis of Reflective Essays to Quantify the Impact of the Modification of a Mechanical Engineering Course. Journal of STEM Education: Innovation and Research, 24(3), 6-13.
Norman GR, Schmidt HG. (1992). The psychological basis of problembased learning - a review of the evidence. Acad Med 1992,67(9), 557–565.
Perry, A.M., & Hong, E. (2023). Planting the seed: Growing community-based PBL teachers with BLOSSOMS. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 24(2), 31-35.
Purwati. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Persamaan Kuadrat Pada Pembelajaran Model Creative Problem Solving. Kadikma, 7(1), 84–93
Rahayu, S., & Amri, F. (2021). Perbandingan Pembelajaran Daring dengan Video dan Zoom terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 4(1), 33–46.
Sanders, M. (2009). Integrative STEM Education: Primer. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-27.
Sandoval. (2005). The Quality Of Students Use Evidence In Writen Scientific Explanation Cognition And Intruction. Journal International Of Science Education, 23(1), 23-25.
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 19–51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Soomro, T.R. (2019). STEM education: United Arab Emirates perspective. Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology, 157–160. DOI:10.1145/3318396.3318414
Sugiyarti, L., Arif, A., & Mursalin. (2018). Pembelajaran abad 21 di SD. Prosiding Seminar Dan Diskusi Nasional Pendidikan Dasar 2018: Pembelajaran Abad 21, 439–444.
Sugiyono, (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanto, Ahmad (2013). Terori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trianto. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Widya, Rifandi, R., and Rahmi, Y.L. (2019). STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: a literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012208
Wood, D.F. (2003) Problem based learning. British Medical Journal, 326. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Novianti Muspiroh, Shofiyah, Shofwatun Nada, Udan Kusmawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education's objective is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Research in STEM Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher, and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education at two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Research in STEM Education will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Research in STEM Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
