The Development of Science Learning Activities by Applying the STEM Education Model to Promote Student Creativity

Authors

  • Wanwisa Sonthong Kalasin University
  • Angkhan Intanin
  • Sasitorn Sanpundorn

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v5i1.1345

Keywords:

STEM education, creativity, satisfaction, Science learning, Assessment metrics

Abstract

This research aimed to design and evaluate science learning activities using the STEM education model to foster creativity among students. Employing a type I developmental methodology, the study was structured into two primary phases: development and evaluation. In the development phase, contemporary educational challenges were identified, leading to the formulation of STEM-based learning activities, which were then tested with a select group of students. For the sample, a distinct student group participated in these STEM activities, with their creativity and satisfaction becoming the central assessment metrics. Results revealed a formulated STEM education model with five essential steps: introduction, problem identification, information gathering, solution design and implementation, and presentation. Following the activities, students' creativity scores averaged at 86.16%, surpassing the target of 80%. Additionally, satisfaction feedback indicated a high average rating of 4.65. To conclude, the customized STEM education model effectively heightened creativity among students, evident from their elevated creativity scores and significant satisfaction rates. Recommendations from this study urge schools and educational institutions to adopt this STEM education model due to its demonstrated efficacy in boosting student creativity and satisfaction, offering a structured methodology to tackle existing educational challenges and stimulate innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altan, E. B., & Ercan, S. (2016). STEM education program for science teachers: perceptions and competencies. Journal of turkish science education, 13(special), 103-117. https://doi.org/ 10.12973/tused.10174a

Anwari, I., Yamada, S., Unno, M., Saito, T., Suwarma, I., Mutakinati, L., & Kumano, Y. (2015). Implementation of authentic learning and assessment through STEM education approach to improve students’ metacognitive skills. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 123-136.

Atthachakara, S. (2021). Developing Practical Skills through Blended Learning Model Using Creativity-Based Learning Activites That Enhances Creative Thinking for Education Students Majoring in Social Studies at Mahasarakham University. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(6), 126-131. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n6p126

Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM education: Innovations and research, 12(5).

Baharin, N., Kamarudin, N., & Manaf, U. K. A. (2018). Integrating STEM education approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 810-821. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4421

Canel, A. N. (2015). A Program Based on the Guilford Model that Enhances Creativity and Creative Psychological Counseling. In International Journal of Health Administration and Education Congress (Sanitas Magisterium) (No. 2, pp. 5-29).

Corrigan, D., Panizzon, D., & Smith, K. (2022). STEM, Creativity and Critical Thinking: How Do Teachers Address Multiple Learning Demands. In Education in the 21st Century: STEM, Creativity and Critical Thinking (pp. 81-97). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Devi, P. K., Herliani, E., Setiawan, R., Yanuar, Y., & Karyana, S. (2018). Bimtek Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

David Aguilera, & Jairo Ortiz-Revilla. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331.

Eroglu, S., & Bektas, O. (2022). The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102181

Guilford, J.P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: Mc Graw – Hill.

Gardner, H., & Weinstein, E. (2018). Creativity: The View from the Big C the introduction of Tiny c.In R. Sternberg, & J, Kaufman. The Nature of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ganira, L. (2022). Adopting STEAM Development Strategies in Early Years Education in Nairobi City County, Kenya: Implication For 21st Century Skills. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 4(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijrse.v4i2.1174

Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing Students' Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of science Learning, 2(2), 50-57.

Ivanov, V., Dimitrov, L., Ivanova, S., & Olefir, O. (2019, October). Creativity enhancement method for STEM education. In 2019 II International Conference on High Technology for Sustainable Development (HiTech) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HiTech48507.2019.9128255

Kay, K. (2010). 21st century skills: Why they matter, what they are, and how we get there. 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn.

Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity research journal, 23(4), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.627805

Kanematsu, H., & Barry, D. M. (2016). STEM and ICT education in intelligent environments (pp. 9-13). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Kusmawan, U. (2022). A Virtual Lab As A Vehicle For Active Learning Through Distance Education. International Journal of Research in STEM Education (IJRSE). ISSN 2721-2904 (online). Volume 4 Number 2 (2022): 18-38

Kusmawan, U. (2017). Kesiapan Belajar Mandiri Guru Sekolah Dasar: Sudi Kasus pada Program Studi PGSD pda FKIP Universitas Terbuka. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016)

Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387-2404. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01231a

Murnawianto, S., Sarwanto, S., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2017). STEM-based science learning in junior high school: Potency for training students’ thinking skill. Pancaran Pendidikan, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v6i4.86

National Economic and Social Development Plan. (2016). Economic Development Plan of Thailand.

Oschepkov, A. A., Kidinov, A. V., Babieva, N. S., Vrublevskiy, A. S., Egorova, E. V., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2022). STEM technology-based model helps create an educational environment for developing students' technical and creative thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), em2110. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12033

Pinasa, S., Siripun, K., & Yuenyong, C. (2018, January). Developing design-based STEM education learning activities to enhance students’ creative thinking. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1923, No. 1, p. 030076). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019567

Putri, N., Rusdiana, D., & Suwarma, I. R. (2019). The Comparison of Student Creative Thinking Skill Using CBL Implemented in STEM Education and Combined with PSL Worksheet in Indonesian School. Journal of Science Learning, 3(1), 7-11.

Putri, N., Rusdiana, D., & Suwarma, I. R. (2020, March). Enhanching physics students’ creative thinking skills using CBL model implemented in STEM in vocational school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1521, No. 4, p. 042045). IOP Publishing.

Root-Bernstein, R. (2015). Arts and crafts as adjuncts to STEM education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 203-212.

Stylianidou, F., Glauert, E., Rossis, D., Compton, A., Cremin, T., Craft, A., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2018). Fostering inquiry and creativity in early years STEM education: Policy recommendations from the Creative Little Scientists Project. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3875

Suherman S, Komarudin K, Supriadi N, & Saregar A. (2021). STEM-E: Fostering mathematical creative thinking ability in the 21st Century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Stretch, E. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Framing failure: Leveraging uncertainty to launch creativity in STEM education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 123-133.

Setyawati, R. D. ., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Astutik, I. D., Nusuki, U., Aini, S. N., Arum, J. P., Widodo, W., Salmah, U., & Zuliah , N. . (2022). Improving Mathematical Critical Thinking Skill through STEM-PjBL: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 4(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijrse.v4i2.1141

Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Taylor, C. W., & Holland, J. (1964). Predictors of creative performance. Creativity: Progress and potential. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1, 64.

The National STEM Center, (2014). Thingwiangthong, P., Termtachatipongsa, P., & Yuenyong, C. (2021, March). Status quo and needs of STEM Education curriculum to enhance creative problem solving competency. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1835, No. 1, p. 012089). IOP Publishing.

Ugras, M. (2018). The Effects of STEM Activities on STEM Attitudes, Scientific Creativity and Motivation Beliefs of the Students and Their Views on STEM Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2018.05.012

Vasquez JA, Sneider C. & Comer M. (2013). Managing learning through a design-

oriented process. STEM-based engineering to develop creativity on balanced topics for grade school students. Secondary school year 10.

Vicharn P. (2015). Developing students to have knowledge and competence in various skills of the 21st century.

Wang, B., & Li, P. P. (2022). Digital creativity in STEM education: the impact of digital tools and pedagogical learning models on the students’ creative thinking skills development. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2155839

Yildirim, B. (2016). An Analyses and Meta-Synthesis of Research on STEM Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 23-33.

Yates, E., & Twigg, E. (2017). Developing creativity in Early Childhood studies students. Thinking skills and creativity. Vol. 23, 42-57 Campbell, C., Speldewinde, C., Howitt, C., & MacDonald, A. (2018). STEM practice in the early years. Creative Education,9, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.001

IJRSE

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31 — Updated on 2023-08-31

How to Cite

Sonthong, W., Intanin, A., & Sanpundorn, S. . (2023). The Development of Science Learning Activities by Applying the STEM Education Model to Promote Student Creativity . International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v5i1.1345

Issue

Section

Research Articles