Integrating STEM Approach in K-12 Science Education Teaching Practice: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v5i2.1598Keywords:
Actual teaching practices, K-12 science education, Systematic review, Integrated STEM approachAbstract
The integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in K-12 education is widely recognized as a critical means to ensure future prosperity, security, and a skilled workforce in these fields. This integrated STEM approach entails teaching these four STEM disciplines in a cohesive manner. However, several barriers have arisen, including the lack of a clear consensus on the key features of implementing integrated STEM education effectively. There remains uncertainty about which science subjects should be integrated with the other three disciplines and at what level within K-12 science education this integration should occur. Therefore, this study aims to establish a well-defined framework for teaching science through an integrated STEM approach (ISTEMA) and identify the types of integrated STEM disciplines employed in various educational settings through a systematic literature review. Secondary data, including scholarly journal articles and book chapters, were collected through searches in databases such as the Educational Resource Information Center (ERIC) and Web of Science. Data analysis was conducted using within-case and cross-case analysis methods. The findings of the study revealed that the framework of teaching science ISTEMA generally consists of six elements: inquiry-based, engineering-based, technology-based, problem-based, teamwork-based, and robotic-based learning. This approach primarily focuses on primary and lower secondary education. Engineering and technology content is predominantly integrated into the science subject. In primary education, science and engineering and science and technology are extensively used, while in lower and upper secondary education, science, engineering, and mathematics, science, technology, and engineering, or STEM are commonly employed.
Downloads
References
A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. (2012). In A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
African Union. Commission. (n.d.). Agenda 2063: the Africa we want.
Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., & Ellefson, M. R. (2008). Bringing Engineering Design into High School Science Classrooms: The Heating/Cooling Unit. In Schunn Source: Journal of Science Education and Technology (Vol. 17, Issue 5). https://about.jstor.org/terms
Aranda, M. L., Guzey, S. S., & Moore, T. J. (2020). Multidisciplinary Discourses in an engineering design-based science curricular unit. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(3), 507-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09517-5
Aranda, M. L., Lie, R., & Selcen Guzey, S. (2020). Productive thinking in middle school science students' design conversations in a design-based engineering challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 6781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09498-5
Ayieko, R. A., Gokbel, E. N., & Nelson, B. (2017). Retrieved from (Vol. 4). http://preserve.lehigh.edu/firehttp://preserve.lehigh.edu/fire/vol4/iss1/5
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2015). Volume 12 Number 2 Engineering Curricula in Early Education: Describing the Landscape of Open Resources. http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/bagiati.html
Ban-Deira, M., Borrelli, S., Bronze, S., de Gasperis, P., Ferrari, P., Gebruers, S., Haesen, S., Sarobe, A., van de Put, E., Weyns, B., & Zarraga, J. (2018). STEAM Education in Europe: A Comparative Analysis Report. www.eurosteamproject.eu
Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). /4, Learning through Problem Solving. In The Journal of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 7, Issue 3).
Bernstein, D., Puttick, G., Wendell, K., Shaw, F., Danahy, E., & Cassidy, M. (2021). Designing biomimetic robots: iterative development of an integrated technology design curriculum. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10061-0
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(34). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Bryan, L., & Guzey, S. S. (2020). K-12 STEM Education: An Overview of Perspectives and Considerations. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 515. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v1i1.5
Century, J., Ferris, K. A., & Zuo, H. (2020). Finding time for computer science in the elementary school day: a quasi-experimental study of a transdisciplinary problem-based learning approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00218-3
Chiang, F. K., Chang, C. H., Wang, S., Cai, R. H., & Li, L. (2022). The effect of an interdisciplinary STEM course on children's attitudes of learning and engineering design skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09603-z
Ching, Y. H., Yang, D., Wang, S., Baek, Y., Swanson, S., & Chittoori, B. (2019). Elementary School Student Development of STEM Attitudes and Perceived Learning in a STEM Integrated Robotics Curriculum. TechTrends, 63(5), 590-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00388-0
Chung, S. K., & Li, D. (2021). Issues-based steam education: A case study in a Hong Kong secondary school. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 22(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.26209/ijea22n3
Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1148
Dasgupta, C., Magana, A. J., & Vieira, C. (2019). Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning. Computers and Education, 129, 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.014
De Vries, M.J. (2018), “International STEM education: The Netherlands as a case, Technology and Engineering Teacher, Vol. 4, pp. 21-25
Dickes, A. C., Farris, A. V., & Sengupta, P. (2020). Sociomathematical Norms for Integrating Coding and Modeling with Elementary Science: A Dialogical Approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09795-7
Gale, J., Alemdar, M., Lingle, J., & Newton, S. (2020). Exploring critical components of an integrated STEM curriculum: an application of the innovation implementation framework. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0204-1
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ganeshkumar, P. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.109934
Guzey, S. S., & Jung, J. Y. (2021). Productive Thinking and Science Learning in Design Teams. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10057-x
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Honey, M. A., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. In STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Marti, M., LÃdeczi, Ã., Grover, S., Wolf, R., Blair, K. P., Chin, D., Conlin, L., Basu, S., & McElhaney, K. (2020). C2STEM: a System for Synergistic Learning of Physics and Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09804-9
Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Zhang, N., Snyder, C., LÃdeczi, Ã., & Marti, M. (2020). Domain-Specific Modeling Languages in Computer-Based Learning Environments: a Systematic Approach to Support Science Learning through Computational Modeling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(4), 537-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00209-z
Jeong, S., & Kim, H. (2015). The effect of a climate change monitoring program on students' knowledge and perceptions of STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1321-1338. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1390a
Jamil, F. M., Linder, S. M., & Stegelin, D. A. (2018). Early Childhood Teacher Beliefs About STEAM Education After a Professional Development Conference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(4), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0875-5
Johnston, A. C., Akarsu, M., Moore, T. J., & Guzey, S. S. (2019). Engineering as the integrator: A case study of one middle school science teacher's talk. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(3), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20286
Johnson, C. C., Walton, B. J., & Breiner, M. J., (2020). STEM Policy in the United State and Canada. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds), HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STEM EDUCATION (1st ed., pp.400-4015). Routledge
Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research. A Literature Review. In American Journal of Preventive Medicine (Vol. 35, Issue 2 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
Kusmawan, U. (2018). Online Microteaching: a Multifaceted Approach to Teacher Professional Development. Journal of Interactive Online Learning.
Kusmawan, U. (2022). A Virtual Lab As A Vehicle For Active Learning Through Distance Education. International Journal of Research in STEM Education (IJRSE), 4(2), 18-38.
Lidinillah, D. A. M., Mulyana, E. H., Karlimah, K., & Hamdu, G. (2019). Integration of STEM learning into the elementary curriculum in Indonesia: An analysis and exploration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012053
Luo, F., Antonenko, P. D., & Davis, E. C. (2020). Exploring the evolution of two girls' conceptions and practices in computational thinking in science. Computers and Education, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103759
Miller, C., & Miller, R. C. (1982). VARIETIES OF INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: A 1981 OVERVIEW. In VARIETIES OF INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: A (Issue 1).
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069
Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Mohamad Said, M. N. H. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225-4288. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111
Ng, C. H., & Adnan, M. (2018). Integrating STEM education through Project-Based Inquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012020
Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies., 1, 149-160
Park, M. H., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G., & Park, D. Y. (2017). Early childhood teachers' beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15614040
Pedaste, M., Meots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 14, pp. 47-61). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Using Unplugged Computational Thinking to Scaffold Natural Selection Learning. American Biology Teacher, 83(2), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2021.83.2.112
Petrosino, A. J., Shekhar, P., & Gustafson, K. A. (n.d.-a). Group-Based Cloud Computing for STEM Education Project (NSF-Award Abstract #1615207) View project STEM Integration: A Study examining the enactment of prescribed Research Based Engineering Curriculum*. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303009406
Petrosino, A. J., Shekhar, P., & Gustafson, K. A. (n.d.-b). Group-Based Cloud Computing for STEM Education Project (NSF-Award Abstract #1615207) View project STEM Integration: A Study examining the enactment of prescribed Research Based Engineering Curriculum*. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303009406
Polydoros, G. (2021). Engaging STEM Methodology to Teach Science in Primary Education. Journal of Research and Opinion JRO, 8(7), 2991-2994. https://doi.org/10.15520/jro.v8i7.115
President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America's Future; Office of the President of the United States: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
Rahman, S. M. M. (2021). Assessing and benchmarking learning outcomes of robotics-enabled stem education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020084
Satchwell, R. E., Loepp, F. L., & Walter, R. A. (2002a). Designing and Implementing an Integrated Mathematics, Science, and Technology Curriculum for the Middle School. In Journal of Industrial Teacher Education (Vol. 39, Issue 3). http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v39n3/satchwell.html
Schellinger, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Southerland, S. A. (2022). Harmonious or disjointed?: Epistemological framing and its role in an integrated science and engineering activity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1), 30-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21720
Science, N., Council, T., & on STEM Education, C. (2018). CHARTING A COURSE FOR SUCCESS: AMERICA'S STRATEGY FOR STEM EDUCATION. http://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp.
Selcen Guzey, S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The Impact of Design-Based STEM Integration Curricula on Student Achievement in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9673-x
Siverling, E. A., Moore, T. J., Suazo-Flores, E., Mathis, C. A., & Guzey, S. S. (2021). What initiates evidence-based reasoning?: Situations that prompt students to support their design ideas and decisions. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(2), 294-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20384
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
Stump, S. L., Bryan, J. A., & McConnell, T. J. (2016). Making STEM Connections. The Mathematics Teacher, 109(8), 576-583. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.8.0576
Tawbush, R. L., Stanley, S. D., Campbell, T. G., & Webb, M. A. (2020). International comparison of K-12 STEM teaching practices. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-01-2020-0004
Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students' attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383-1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., Wang, H., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
Wei, B., & Chen, Y. (2020). Integrated STEM Education in K-12: Theory Development, Status, and Prospects. In Theorizing STEM Education in the 21st Century. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88141
Wieselmann, J. R., Keratithamkul, K., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Discourse Analysis in Integrated STEM Activities: Methods for Examining Power and Positioning in Small Group Interactions. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09950-w
Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., & Lin, Q. (2020). Improving and Assessing Computational Thinking in Maker Activities: the Integration with Physics and Engineering Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8
Ziaeefard, S., Miller, M. H., Rastgaar, M., & Mahmoudian, N. (2017). Co-robotics hands-on activities: A gateway to engineering design and STEM learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 97, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.07.013
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 SOKHA KHUT, Shimizu KINYA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education's objective is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Research in STEM Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher, and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education at two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Research in STEM Education will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Research in STEM Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
