Universalizing science literacy: How to transcend deficit models of teaching and learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v5i2.1224Keywords:
Disciplinary literacy, Universal design, Deficit model of teaching and learning, Abundance model of teaching and learning, STEM education, Student success, Disability Studies, Enabling universityAbstract
Student attrition figures are a hidden metric in universities. They signify institutional failure, inhibit branding and marketing campaigns, and displace blame onto individual students. Behind the thousands of cases of attrition are individual stories of shame, guilt, failure, confusion, and lost future hopes and aspirations. This article explores how students' in and through their diversity - can be supported to succeed. Critiquing the deficit model of teaching and learning and deploying both universal design and the abundance model of teaching and learning, this article provides new strategies for student success. We offer innovative methodologies to understand and enable productive pathways by students through a curriculum. The goal is to enhance and enliven science education and demonstrate the gift and power of well-qualified university academics aligning innovative research and teaching.
Downloads
References
Alber, T. (2013). Tools for teaching: ditching the deficit model. Edutopia, April 2: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/teaching-tool-ditching-deficit-model-rebecca-alber
Aronowitz, S. (2000). The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning. Boston: Beacon Press.
Barnes, D. (2007). Disability, higher education and the inclusive society. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 28.1: 135-145
Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 313-328.
Ben-Moshe, L., Cory, R., Feldbaum, M. and Sagendorf, K. (2005) Building pedagogical curb cuts: Incorporating disability into the university classroom and curriculum. Syracuse: Syracuse University Graduate School.
Betts, M. and Rosemann, M. (2023). The New Learning Economy: Thriving beyond higher education. London. Routledge.
Bheekie, A., & van Huyssteen, M. (2015). Be mindful of your discomfort: An approach to contextualized learning. The International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 3(1).
Brabazon, T. (2002). Digital hemlock: Internet education and the poisoning of teaching. UNSW Press.
Brabazon, T. (2008). The University of Google: Education in the (post) information age. Ashgate.
Brabazon, T. (2013). Digital Dieting. Ashgate.
Brabazon, T. (2015). Enabling university: Impairment, (dis) ability and social justice in higher education. Springer.
Brabazon, T. (2016). Don't fear the reaper? The Zombie University and eating braaaains. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 4(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2016.21
Brabazon, T. (2021). The front stage of leadership? Vice chancellor profiles and the performance of self. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education Studies, 8(4), 36-65. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v8i4p36
Brown, B. (2016). Brené Brown encourages educators to normalize the discomfort of learning and reframe failure as learning. About Campus, 20(6), 3-7.
Burge, M. (2022) Former University of New England vice-chancellor pleads not guilty to assault charge. Guardian. September 26. https://amp.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/sep/26/former-university-of-new-england-vice-chancellor-pleads-not-guilty-to-assault-charge?fbclid =IwAR0DMudA0fwQezpTtlCpnHA2cpiJoVdZbyAE9x0xCw52WZ2nZ40GINFueWg
Chandler, D. and Reid, J. (2016). The neoliberal subject: resilience, adaptation and vulnerability. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Collins, J. (1998). Language and class in minority education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 19(4): 299-326.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2006). United Nations. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
De la Harpe, B., & David, C. (2012). Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 493-510.
Douse, M., & Uys, P. (2018). Educational Planning in the Age of Digitisation. Educational Planning, 25(2), 7-23.
Dudley-Marling, C. (2007). Return of the deficit. Journal of Educational Controversy, 2(1): https://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.au/&httpsredir=1&article=1028&context=jec,
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3-14.
Fatunde, T. (2015). Controversy over criteria to appoint Vice Chancellors. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20151005162717965
Ferns, S. (2012, 29 October - 2 November). Graduate Employability: Teaching Staff, employer and graduate perceptions Australian Collaborative Education Network National Conference, Deakin University, Geelong.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., García-Holgado, A., Dominguez, A., & Pascual, J. (2022). Women in STEM in Higher Education: Good Practices of Attraction, Access and Retention in Higher Education. Springer.
Gorski, P. (2009). What we're teaching teachers: an analysis of multicultural teacher education coursework syllabi. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2): 309-318
Gorski, P. (2010). Unlearning deficit ideology and the scornful gaze: thoughts on authenticating the class discourse in education, Education Change: http://www.edchange.org/publications/deficit-ideology-scornful-gaze.pdf
Graham, S. (2000). Should the natural learning approach replace spelling instruction? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 235.
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard educational review, 81(4), 710-744.
Greece, J. A., Dejong, W., Gorenstein Schonfeld, J., Sun, M., & McGrath, D. (2019). Practice-Based Teaching and Public Health Training: Bringing Real-World Projects to the Classroom to Teach Intervention Planning and Communication Strategies. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 5(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379918760929
Hand, B. (2017). Exploring the role of writing in science: a 25-year journey. (Report). Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 25(3), 16.
Harland, T. (2017). Professional learning for academics and the scholarship of teaching and learning.
Harris, A. (2016). Integrating written communication skills: working towards a whole of course approach. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(3), 287-300.
Harry, B. and Klingner, J. (2007). Discarding the deficit mode. Educational Leadership, 64(5): http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb07/vol64/num05/Discarding-the-Deficit-Model.aspx
Hawkins, B., & Wilson, B. (2017). A Fresh Theoretical Perspective on Practice-Led Research. International journal of art & design education, 36(1), 82-91.
Heimlich, J. E. (2019). Queering STEM learningscapes. In STEM of Desire (pp. 161-176). Brill.
Herrando-Pérez, S., Bradshaw, C. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Vieites, D. R. (2019). Statistical language backs conservatism in climate-change assessments. BioScience, 69(3), 209-219.
ICAC. (2020). ICAC Statement about an investigation: Misconduct by the vice-chancellor of the University of Adelaide. Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC). https://www.icac.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/370715/ICAC_Statement_About_an_Investigation-University_of_Adelaide.pdf
Jaidev, R., & Chan, P. (2018). Embedding communication in the disciplines: a tale of two faculties. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 199-211.
Kohen, Z., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2020). How to promote chemical literacy? On-line question posing and communicating with scientists. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.
Koo, D., & Miner, K. (2010). Outcome-Based Workforce Development and Education in Public Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 31(1), 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103705
Research in STEM Education (IJRSE), 4(2), 18–38. Lombardi, J. (2016). The deficit model is harming your students. Edutopia: https://www.edutopia.org/blog/deficit-model-is-harming-students-janice-lombardi
Mace, R. L. (1998). universal design in Housing. Assistive Technology, 10(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131957
Main, D., Weeks, C., Buller, H., MacAllister, L., & van Dijk, L. (2017). Learning from the experts: innovation within practice-led collaborative networks in the laying hen sector. Xth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare,
Marcos, C. (2022). "New York University Professor fired after students say his class was too hard. The Guardian,
Massimi, M. and McCoy, C. (2020). Understanding Perspectivism: scientific challenges and methodological prospects. New York. Routledge.
Mcmillan, T. (2022). At NYU students were failing organic chemistry. Who is to blame? New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/us/nyu-organic-chemistry-petition.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article
Mcnamee, M., Fleming, S., Shire, J., Jones, D., McNamee, M., & Pill, A. (2004). Continuing professional development: Suggestions for effective practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2), 165-177.
Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: the campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. New York. Oxford University Press.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
O'Brien, S. (2021). Mark Scott appointed as new Vice Chancellor. Honi Soit. http://honisoit.com/2021/03/mark-scott-appointed-as-new-vice-chancellor/
O'Neill, D. K., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Why educate "little scientists?" Examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 234-266.
Oliver, M. (2009). Understanding disability: from theory to practice. London. Palgrave.
Permatasari, D. (2016). The role of productive struggle to enhance learning mathematics with understanding. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science,
Powell, J. (2013). From Ableism to Accessibility in the universal design University. Review of Disability Studies. 8.4: 33-44.
Roth, W.M., & Lee, S. (2016). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science.
Segura, D., & Mohorn-Mintah, O. (2019). Reflections on Undergraduate Science Experiences: A Push to Science Teaching. In Critical Voices in Science Education Research (pp. 47-58). Springer.
Sleeter, C. (2004). Context-conscious portraits and context-blind policy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(1): 132-136
Stevens, S., Mills, R., & Kuchel, L. (2019). Teaching communication in general science degrees: highly valued but missing the mark. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1163-1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1578861
Szostak, R. (2022). Making sense of the future. Abingdon. Routledge.
Tett, G. (2021). Anthro-Vision: A New Way to See in Business and Life. Simon and Schuster.
van Dijk, L., Buller, H., MacAllister, L., & Main, D. (2017). Facilitating practice-led co-innovation for the improvement in animal welfare. Outlook on agriculture, 46(2), 131-137.
Wilson, A., Howitt, S., Wilson, K., & Roberts, P. (2012). Academics' perceptions of the purpose of undergraduate research experiences in a research-intensive degree. Studies in Higher Education, 37(5), 513-526.
Wrenn, J., & Wrenn, B. (2009). Enhancing learning by integrating theory and practice. International Journal of Teaching and learning in higher education, 21(2), 258-265.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tara Brabazon, Jamie Quinton, Narelle Hunter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Research in STEM Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
The International Journal of Research in STEM Education's objective is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Research in STEM Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher, and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education at two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Research in STEM Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Research in STEM Education will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the International Journal of Research in STEM Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Research in STEM Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
