Socio-Adaptive Dimension of Students’ Personal Space

Authors

  • Iryna Havryliuk Department of General Education, MODUL University Dubai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeiece.v1i1.41

Abstract

Psychological literature presents such notions as "living space," "mental image," "psychological space," etc.; however, only a few pieces of research practically view the modal content of students' spatial organization within the limits of their social and adaptive security. Therefore, it is essential to develop empirical programs for studying the modal features of students' personal space in a socio-adaptive dimension. The article aims to introduce and apply conceptual and methodological support for studying the issue mentioned above; explain the psychological content of modal signs of students' personal space in a socio-adaptive dimension. The following methods were used to conduct the research: theoretical (analysis, synthesis, comparison, abstraction, systematization, and generalization); empirical (observation and conversation); mathematical statistics (Kruskal-Wallis H Test). Data were processed using SPSS Statistics software, version 13.0. One hundred fifty-seven students aged 18 to 25 were invited to participate in research. After specifying the study stages, defining strategies and applying various psychodiagnostic methods, the results were as follows: a) Students with a high level of personal space sovereignty (45.9 % of testees) demonstrated profound control over life; it indicates excellent socio-psychological adaptation and mental well-being of an individual, combined with high standards of autonomy and self-identity; b) Students with a medium sovereignty level (38.2 % of testees) expressed an uncertain position related to determining their personal space. It is often associated with social factors of an individual's self-realization, which impede and even destroy the potential establishment of a holistic, full-fledged own space; c) Students with a low level of psychological space sovereignty (15.9 % of testees) showed the signs of deprivation; such young people might experience alienation and fragmentation of their own life, complications in the search for the object of identification. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abulhanova-Slavskaya K. A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni [Life strategy]. Moskva: Myisl, 299 s.

Byuyul A. P. (2005). TsYofel. SPSS: Iskusstvo obrabotki informatsii. Analiz statisticheskih dannyh i vosstanovlenie skryityih zakonomernostey [Tzofel SPSS: The Art of Information Processing. Analysis of statistical data and the restoration of hidden laws]. Sankt-Peterburg: «DiaSoftYuP», 608 s.

Erikson E. (1996). Identichnost: yunost i krizi [Identity: youth and crises]. Moskva: Izdatelskaya gruppa «Progress», 344 s.

Hoshovskyi Ya. O. (2008). Resotsializatsiia depryvovanoi osobystosti [Resocialization of deprived personality]. Drohobych: Kolo, 480 s..

Koshyrets V. V. (2010). Informatsiinyi prostir osobystosti: interpretatsiini protyrichchia vyznachennia [Informational space of personality: interpretative contradictions of definition]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy – Psychological Prospects, 17, 118-125.

Maksymenko S. D. (2013). K voprosu o vnutrennem prostranstve svobody i lichnosti [On the issue of the internal space of individual freedom]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: zb. nauk. pr. Kamianets-Podil. nats. un-tu im. I. Ohiienka, In-tu psykholohii im. H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: collection of scientific works of the Kamyanets-Podilsky National University named after I. Ogienko, G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 20, 7-18.

Nartova-Bochaver S. K. (2002). Ponyatie «psihologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti» i ego evristicheskie vozmozhnosti [The concept of “psychological space of the individual†and its heuristic capabilities]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie – Psychological science and education, 1, 35-42.

Nartova-Bochaver S. K. (2005). Psihologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti [Psychological space of personality]. Moskva: Prometey, 311 s.

Royce, J., Powell, A. (1983). Theory of Personality and Individual Differences: Factors, Systems, and Processes. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 206 p.

Serbin Y. (2018). Vplyv osobystisnoho adaptyvnoho potentsialu studentiv humanitariiv na protses yikhnoi adaptatsii do navchannia [Influence of personal adaptive potential of students of humanities on the process of their adaptation to studying]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 5-6, 19-25.

Virna Zh. P. (2014). Profesiinyi prostir osobystosti: vid oznak dystsyplinarnosti do realnosti subiektyvnoho modeliuvannia [Professional space of personality: from the signs of discipline to the reality of subjective modeling]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: zb. nauk. pr. Kamianets-Podil. nats. un-tu im. I. Ohiienka, In-tu psykholohii im. H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: collection of scientific works of the Kamyanets-Podilsky National University named after I. Ogienko, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 23, 100-111.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-23

How to Cite

Havryliuk, I. (2020). Socio-Adaptive Dimension of Students’ Personal Space. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Early Childhood Education, 1(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijeiece.v1i1.41

Issue

Section

Research Articles