Challenges and Coping Strategies of Intermediate Teachers in Handling Generation Z Learners


  • Ladylou Dejacto Department of Education
  • Francis May Valmorida Saint Columban College
  • Genesis Naparan


challenges, coping strategies, generation Z learners


The learners as of the present are called Generation Z learners. This study aimed to come up with the common challenges and coping strategies of teachers in handling Generation Z learners in the intermediate level. The study was conducted during the school year 2019-2020. The participants were the intermediate teachers in District 10 of Ozamiz City Division. This study employed a phenomenological qualitative research design. The focus of this study was to gather the common challenges and coping strategies of teachers based on their experiences. The responses were analyzed through the use of thematic analysis. It was found out that the challenges commonly met by the intermediate teachers were learners’ difficult behaviors, negative impact of technology/inappropriate use of technology and poor academic performance. The study also revealed that the coping strategies of the teachers were ICT integration in teaching, imposing friendly classroom discipline, parent-teacher partnership, and enhancing teachers’ ICT literacy. This study suggested that in planning teachers’ training programs, administrators of the Department of Education should also include topics that focuses on how to cope up teachers’ challenges met in their classrooms. Topics may involve handling Generation Z learners and developing necessary skills in innovative teaching.



Acosta, M. (2016). Paradigm Shift in Open Education and E-Learning Resources as

Teaching and Learning in Philippines. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 4(2), 161-172.Retrievedfrom:

Arulchelvan, P., Veramuthu, P., Singh, P. K. P., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). iGen

Digital Learners: Let’s Collaborate via Coggle. Creative Education, 10(01), 178. Retrieved from

Bazeley, J. W., & Shrimplin, A. (2014). The Value of Purchasing E-Books From a Large

Publisher: A Usage-based Analysis of Oxford University Press E-Books. Retrieved from:

Carter, T. (2018). Preparing Generation Z for the teaching profession. SRATE

Journal, 27(1),1-8.Retrievedfrom

Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The challenge of teaching generation Z. PEOPLE: International

Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1). Retrieved from

Confait, S. (2015). Beginning teachers’ challenges in their pursuit of effective teaching

practices. Cogent Education, 2(1), 991179.Retrieved from

Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Driven by beliefs: Understanding

challenges physical science teachers face when integrating engineering and physics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(2),5.Retrievedfrom peer

Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Want to close the achievement gap? Close the teaching

gap. AmericanEducator, 38(4),14-18.Retrieved from

DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2015). Efficacy of the Social Skills

Improvement System Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) primary version. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 123.Retrieved from:

Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., Bunuan, R. L., Muething, C. S., & Vega Jr, R. (2014). Effects

of the Good Behavior Game on challenging behaviors in school settings. Review of educational research, 84(4), 546-571.Retrieved from:

Gaikhorst, L., Beishuizen, J., Roosenboom, B., & Volman, M. (2017). The challenges of

beginning teachers in urban primary schools. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 46-61. Retrieved from

Gillispie, V. (2016). Using the flipped classroom to bridge the gap to generation

Y. Ochsner Journal, 16(1), 32-36. Retrieved from:

Hill, T. R., Doyle, M., Kocsis, D., Sessions, R., & Jackson, R. (2017). Inroads to Engaging

iGeneration Students in Innovative IS Education: Lessons Learned in the Trenches.Retrievedfrom:

Izzah, L., Hadi, M. S., & Ab Rahman, N. F. Engaging Learners with the Internet of Things

(IoT): Gen Z’s Perspectives. In PROCEEDINGS OF EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM 2019 (p. 150). Retrieved from

Jansen, C., & van der Merwe, P. (2015). Teaching Practice in the 21st Century: Emerging

Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(3), 190-199. Retrieved from:

Kee, C. N. L., & Samsudin, Z. (2014). Mobile Devices: Toys or Learning Tools for the 21st

Century Teenagers?. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(3),107-122.Retrievedfrom

Khan, A., Fleva, E., & Qazi, T. (2015). Role of self-esteem and general self-efficacy in

teachers’ efficacy in primary schools. Psychology, 6(01), 117. Retrieved from:

Koulopoulos, T., & Keldsen, D. (2016). Gen Z effect: The six forces shaping the future of


Lisenbee, P. (2016). Generation gap between students' needs and teachers' use of

technology in classrooms. Retrieved from

Lyons, S., Urick, M., Kuron, L., & Schweitzer, L. (2015). Generational differences in the

workplace: There is complexity beyond the stereotypes. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(3), 346-356. Retrieved from

Metto, E., & Makewa, L. N. (2014). Learner-centered teaching: Can it work in Kenyan

public primary schools. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(11A), 23-29. Retrieved from

Nagy, Ã., & Kolcsey, A. (2017). Generation Alpha: Marketing or Science. Acta

Technologica Dubnicae, 7(1), 107-115.Retrieved from

Ntumi, S. (2016). Challenges Pre-School Teachers Face in the Implementation of the

Early Childhood Curriculum in the Cape Coast Metropolis. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 54-62. Retrieved from

Olgan, R. (2015). Influences on Turkish early childhood teachers’ science teaching

practices and the science content covered in the early years. Early Child Development and Care, 185(6), 926-942. Retrieved from

Osiceanu, M. E. (2015). Psychological implications of modern technologies:“technofobiaâ€

versus “technophiliaâ€. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1137-1144. Retrieved from:

Okiridu, O. S. F., & Ogwunte, P. C. (2018). Issues and Trends in the Application of E- learning Technologies in Teaching Business Education in Universities in Niger Delta. National Association of Business Educators of Nigeria, 5(1), 134-141. Retrieved from

Ozkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015). The changing face of the employees–generation Z and

their perceptions of work (a study applied to university students). Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 476-483. Retrieved from

Philomina, M. J., & Amutha, S. (2016). Information and communication technology

awareness among teacher educators. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(8), 603. Retrieved from

Rajabion, L. Generation Z Students: Will They Change Our Computer Science and IT


Ramos, M. (2019). Back to School for 27.2 Million Students;DepEd Vows Improvements.

Retrieved from school-for-27-2-million-students-deped-vows-improvements

Rothman, D. (2016). A Tsunami of learners called Generation Z. URL: http://www. mdle.

net/JoumaFA_Tsunami_of_Learners_Called_Generation_Z.pdf. Retrieved from

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next

generation of students. About Campus, 22(3), 21-26. Retrieved from

Sladek, S., & Grabinger, A. (2014). Gen Z. Introducing the first Generation of the 21st

Century Available at https://goo. gl/Iu5o2t [accessed December 2016]. Retrieved from

Sullivan, A. M., Johnson, B., Owens, L., & Conway, R. (2014). Punish them or engage

them? Teachers’ views of unproductive student behaviours in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), Retrieved from:4.

Swanzen, R. (2018). Facing the generation chasm: the parenting and teaching of

generations Y and Z. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(2),125-150.Retrievedfrom

Taleb, Z., Ahmadi, A., & Musavi, M. (2015). The effect of m-learning on mathematicslearning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 83-


Torocsik, M., Szucs, K., & Kehl, D. (2014). How generations think: research on generation

z. Acta universitatis Sapientiae, communicatio, 1(1), 23-45.Retrieved from content/uploads/2017/09/comm1-3.pdf

Trussell, R. P., Lewis, T. J., & Raynor, C. (2016). The impact of universal teacher practices

and function-based behavior interventions on the rates of problem behaviors among at-risk students. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(3),261-282.Retrieved from:

Tung, L. C., & Comeau, J. D. (2014). Demographic Transformation in Defining Malaysian

Generations: The Seekers (Pencari), The Buiders (Pembina), The Developers (Pemaju), and Generation Z (Generasi Z). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4),383.Retrieved from




How to Cite

Dejacto, L., Valmorida, F. M. ., & Naparan, G. (2023). Challenges and Coping Strategies of Intermediate Teachers in Handling Generation Z Learners. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 5(2), 13–30. Retrieved from