Challenges and Coping Strategies of Intermediate Teachers in Handling Generation Z Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33830/ijtaese.v5i2.1442Keywords:
challenges, coping strategies, generation Z learnersAbstract
The learners as of the present are called Generation Z learners. This study aimed to come up with the common challenges and coping strategies of teachers in handling Generation Z learners in the intermediate level. The study was conducted during the school year 2019-2020. The participants were the intermediate teachers in District 10 of Ozamiz City Division. This study employed a phenomenological qualitative research design. The focus of this study was to gather the common challenges and coping strategies of teachers based on their experiences. The responses were analyzed through the use of thematic analysis. It was found out that the challenges commonly met by the intermediate teachers were learners’ difficult behaviors, negative impact of technology/inappropriate use of technology and poor academic performance. The study also revealed that the coping strategies of the teachers were ICT integration in teaching, imposing friendly classroom discipline, parent-teacher partnership, and enhancing teachers’ ICT literacy. This study suggested that in planning teachers’ training programs, administrators of the Department of Education should also include topics that focuses on how to cope up teachers’ challenges met in their classrooms. Topics may involve handling Generation Z learners and developing necessary skills in innovative teaching.
References
Acosta, M. (2016). Paradigm Shift in Open Education and E-Learning Resources as Teaching and Learning in Philippines. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 4(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v4i2.94
Arulchelvan, P., Veramuthu, P., Singh, P. K. P., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). iGen Digital Learners: Let’s Collaborate via Coggle. Creative Education, 10(01), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.101014
Bazeley, J. W., & Shrimplin, A. (2014). The Value of Purchasing E-Books From a Large Publisher: A Usage-based Analysis of Oxford University Press E-Books. Retrieved from: https://sc.lib.miamioh.edu/bitstream/handle/2374.MIA/5123/valueebksoxford_timberline2012_pres.pdf?sequence=1
Carter, T. (2018). Preparing Generation Z for the teaching profession. SRATE Journal, 27(1),1-8. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1166694.pdf
Cilliers, E. J. (2017). The challenge of teaching generation Z. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198
Confait, S. (2015). Beginning teachers’ challenges in their pursuit of effective teaching practices. Cogent Education, 2(1), 991179, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2014.991179
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Driven by beliefs: Understanding challenges physical science teachers face when integrating engineering and physics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(2),5, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1098
Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Want to close the achievement gap? Close the teaching gap. AmericanEducator, 38(4),14-18. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1049111.pdf
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2015). Efficacy of the Social Skills Improvement System Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS-CIP) primary version. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000079
Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., Bunuan, R. L., Muething, C. S., & Vega Jr, R. (2014). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on challenging behaviors in school settings. Review of educational research, 84(4), 546-571. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314536781
Gaikhorst, L., Beishuizen, J., Roosenboom, B., & Volman, M. (2017). The challenges of beginning teachers in urban primary schools. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1251900
Gillispie, V. (2016). Using the flipped classroom to bridge the gap to generation Y. Ochsner Journal, 16(1), 32-36. Retrieved from: http://www.ochsnerjournal.org/content/16/1/32?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Ochsner_Journal_TrendMD_0
Hill, T. R., Doyle, M., Kocsis, D., Sessions, R., & Jackson, R. (2017). Inroads to Engaging iGeneration Students in Innovative IS Education: Lessons Learned in the Trenches. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Timothy-Hill-10/publication/317266975_Inroads_to_Engaging_iGeneration_Students_in_Innovative_IS_Education_Lessons_Learned_in_the_Trenches/links/592f0537a6fdcc89e7733985/Inroads-to-Engaging-iGeneration-Students-in-Innovative-IS-Education-Lessons-Learned-in-the-Trenches.pdf
Izzah, L., Hadi, M. S., & Ab Rahman, N. F. Engaging Learners with the Internet of Things (IoT): Gen Z’s Perspectives. IN PROCEEDINGS OF EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM 2019 (p. 150). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohd_Asnorhisham_Adam2/publication/334277488_INTERNATIONAL_SOCIETY_FOR_EDUCATIONAL_INITIATIVES_ISEI/links/5d20b3f092851cf4406c0868/INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY-FOR-EDUCATIONAL-INITIATIVES-ISEI.pdf#page=158
Jansen, C., & van der Merwe, P. (2015). Teaching Practice in the 21st Century: Emerging Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(3), 190-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030304
Kee, C. N. L., & Samsudin, Z. (2014). Mobile Devices: Toys or Learning Tools for the 21st Century Teenagers?. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(3),107-122.Retrievedfrom https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1034238.pdf
Khan, A., Fleva, E., & Qazi, T. (2015). Role of self-esteem and general self-efficacy in teachers’ efficacy in primary schools. Psychology, 6(01), 117-125. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.61010
Koulopoulos, T., & Keldsen, D. (2016). Gen Z effect: The six forces shaping the future of business.Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315230337/gen-effect-tom-koulopoulos-dan-keldsen
Lisenbee, P. (2016). Generation gap between students' needs and teachers' use of technology in classrooms. Retrieved from https://twu-ir.tdl.org/handle/11274/12172
Lyons, S., Urick, M., Kuron, L., & Schweitzer, L. (2015). Generational differences in the workplace: There is complexity beyond the stereotypes. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(3), 346-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.48
Metto, E., & Makewa, L. N. (2014). Learner-centered teaching: Can it work in Kenyan public primary schools. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(11A), 23-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/education-2-11A-4
Nagy, Á., & Kolcsey, A. (2017). Generation Alpha: Marketing or Science. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 7(1), 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/atd-2017-0007
Ntumi, S. (2016). Challenges Pre-School Teachers Face in the Implementation of the Early Childhood Curriculum in the Cape Coast Metropolis. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 54-62. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1089727.pdf
Olgan, R. (2015). Influences on Turkish early childhood teachers’ science teaching practices and the science content covered in the early years. Early Child Development and Care, 185(6), 926-942. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.967689
Osiceanu, M. E. (2015). Psychological implications of modern technologies:“technofobia” versus “technophilia”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1137-1144. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.229
Okiridu, O. S. F., & Ogwunte, P. C. (2018). Issues and Trends in the Application of E- learning Technologies in Teaching Business Education in Universities in Niger Delta. National Association of Business Educators of Nigeria, 5(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v6i130166
Ozkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015). The changing face of the employees–generation Z and their perceptions of work (a study applied to university students). Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 476-483. Retrieved from https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S221256711500876X?token=9D07671AB557C8008F67E7EA142946F1B127CF2B30A0FAD4139AE817521A0438A6BF9A5736324A0009704F0A35166169
Philomina, M. J., & Amutha, S. (2016). Information and communication technology awareness among teacher educators. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(8), 603-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.759
Rajabion, L. Generation Z Students: Will They Change Our Computer Science and IT Classrooms?, 16(4), 8-12. Retrieved from:. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7c93/512f59026f97c28660c0467e90f7f5e56282.pdf
Ramos, M. (2019). Back to School for 27.2 Million Students;DepEd Vows Improvements. Retrieved from https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1126063/back-to-school-for-27-2-million-students-deped-vows-improvements
Rothman, D. (2016). A Tsunami of learners called Generation Z. URL: http://www.mdle. net/JoumaFA_Tsunami_of_Learners_Called_Generation_Z.pdf
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus, 22(3), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293
Sladek, S., & Grabinger, A. (2014). Gen Z. Introducing the first Generation of the 21st Century. XYZ University, CA.
Sullivan, A. M., Johnson, B., Owens, L., & Conway, R. (2014). Punish them or engage them? Teachers’ views of unproductive student behaviours in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.6
Swanzen, R. (2018). Facing the generation chasm: the parenting and teaching of generations Y and Z. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(2), 125-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs92201818216
Taleb, Z., Ahmadi, A., & Musavi, M. (2015). The effect of m-learning on mathematicslearning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 83-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.092
Torocsik, M., Szucs, K., & Kehl, D. (2014). How generations think: research on generation z. Acta universitatis Sapientiae, communicatio, 1(1), 23-45. Retrieved from http://grupespsichoterapija.lt/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/comm1-3.pdf
Trussell, R. P., Lewis, T. J., & Raynor, C. (2016). The impact of universal teacher practices and function-based behavior interventions on the rates of problem behaviors among at-risk students. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(3),261-282. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0012
Tung, L. C., & Comeau, J. D. (2014). Demographic Transformation in Defining Malaysian Generations: The Seekers (Pencari), The Buiders (Pembina), The Developers (Pemaju), and Generation Z (Generasi Z). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4),383. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i4/809
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ladylou Dejacto, Francis May Valmorida, Genesis Naparan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education.ÂÂ
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
